Local Business SEO - The Game Has Changed For 2011

Local businesses need to realise that for 2011, there is a step change in search engine marketing.

The old rules of SEO no longer apply. I'll explain why, then I'll suggest some key points that local businesses need to think about.

So - what's changed?

This morning I noticed that the traffic to one of my most visited pages on my blog had seriously dropped.  In early 2008 I wrote about "Raja-Fashions Tailor-Made Hong Kong Suits, Online Meets Offline". It was an experiment, to see just from copy writing using the right keywords I could achieve a good search ranking for "Raja Fashions". Just for kicks.  And it worked.  Number 2 in Google for "Raja Fashions" after the business itself.

In the last two weeks, traffic to this site has halved.  Looking at the reasons why made me realise that as far as Google is concerned, the game has changed.

What's happened now is that instead of being number 2 in the results, high up on the page, Google has massively increased the amount of screen space it uses for the relevant local business result.  Now the "place page" has taken centre stage.

Now as you can see, my blog isn't seen on the screen.  I can count already 17 links to the Raja Fashions site, 4 links to their place page and a two links to "more results from rajafashions.com".

(Now - I am stuffing this blog entry with lots of Raja Fashions keywords, but in this case I'm just doing to tell the story, I'm not doing it to try re-claim my ranking, that's for sure! Although, I can recommend having a high ranking page with lots of opinion on it to use as leverage when you're dealing with a Chinese salesman and you're negotiating on price - but that's another story...)

3 important implications for local businesses...

1. Claim your place page.

Local businesses need to claim their place page more than ever.  These pages will get more traffic, make sure the information is complete and accurate.

2. Design your website navigation with Google in mind. 

Local businesses need to make sure that their website navigation has key call to action and information categories on the menu so that these links are the links shown on the Google results page under the main result.  For example if you were a restaurant, you would want a "Book A Table" link on your primary navigation and a landing page for that purpose.  As well as having the booking interface on the homepage as well of course.

3. Bid on your own brand name

This will push all the aggregators even further down the page because you're claiming the top slot on the page. More real estate for you.

Strategically, here's how I read the situation...

Google has always struggled to sell to local businesses.  They've not got a sales force, unlike yellow page companies or Groupon.  So - they need an automated touch point.  By pushing the place page they do two things.  They drive more traffic to place pages so that local business owners start to take notice.  In parallel, aggregators have to pay to be seen because if you're aggregating local businesses, you're not going to get the same returns that you used to on SEO as there's less and less first page screen real estate to be seen on - so better PPC revenues.  Then, they develop their own automated promotions engine on the platform, coupons, vouchers etc.  Groupon, watch out.

Meandering Meetings and Excessive Email

Recently I saw a debate on an online forum about productivity.  A strange place to debate perhaps given that online forums are possibly one of the best ways to be unproductive. Part of the discussion questioned the value of meetings (meetings are toxic, a time-waster, just don't have them) and one contributor advocated that email is best - that you get more done by email than by meeting face to face.  This, in complete contrast to one of my colleagues who detests email and prefers to meet face to face - for just the same reasons.

We all have opinions it seems.  Some say meetings are effective and that email is counter-productive, others say that email is highly productive and meetings are a waste of time.  I simplify of course.  There's other interaction methods such as IM, telephone calls, SMS, faxes (remember those?), conference calls... etc!

If anyone tells me that one belief, faith, method or product is categorically better than another - I don't believe them.

This world has been built on oversimplification.  We simplify because the world is too complex. Some say an Apple Mac is always better than a PC?  Is it?  Always?  Sometimes maybe it is, sometimes not - it depends on what it's been used for.  Context.  A is better than B only some of the time, but B can sometimes be the best way.

Emails or meetings?  Learn to know the difference. I believe that if a message doesn't get through, it's not the fault of the recipient.  The sender needs to communicate in a way that the receiver understands.  Some people respond well to email, others don't.  Understand your audience and figure out which channel to use to get the job done.  If a meeting will get the job done, have a meeting.  If email will work best (for that audience) - use email.

Getting things done requires time to focus, time to collaborate, time to be challenged, time to ask for feedback, time to make decisions.  Saying one method of communications is bad or better is totally missing the point. Context matters.  You're sending or receiving a message.  This is basic marketing communications; understand the audience, select the best channel to engage with them.  Adapt.

One more closing thought.  Being productive does not equal being busy.  I've found that good work is rarely done in one sitting.  Starting a job and seeing it through are important, but equally important are the gaps in between where free thought (say - in the shower, in bed, walking to work) allows ideas to cascade, collide and connect.  Returning to the job in hand, your ideas are firmer, maybe you have new ideas - or see new methods.  My mantra is to focus, but be free.  I try to give myself time to explore my thoughts with others, (say - in coffee shops, or at lunch) - and not feel guilty about it.  It just might not look like I'm busy.

Judge me on the output and not the input or the method.

Habit - The Enemy Of Evolution

If evolution is a natural state, so is habit. They're a tricky pair, evolution and habit - but in my view, they are remarkably prevalent.

Evolution needs to be understood to understand how business value is created and sustained.  Good business ideas (that create value) are rarely thought up out of nothing - they build on what came before - they are the product of evolution.  Evolution brings constant change and adaptation to the changing environment - and this can generate new value.

Habit needs to be understood to realise why value gets eroded.  Habits are repetitive, with no change and adaptation to the changing environment - and habits can erode existing value by failing to adapt to changing circumstances.

We typically think of evolution from a Darwinist perspective - that is - we relate evolutionary theory to how species have changed over time.  Even people who don't agree that this is how we came to be (e.g. have a creationist bias), they still understand what evolutionary theory proposes.

Evolution can be summarised in three words: "differentiate, select, amplify" - are these three words our code not only for surviving, but for progressing, succeeding and winning?

To recap, Darwin suggested that "Favourable variations would tend to be preserved and unfavourable ones to be destroyed".  Note the word "variations".  This is the essence of evolutionary theory.  Take something, create a few variants, see which variant works best in that environment.

I suggest that anything created is built upon what was created before.  We see ideas, we merge them, we use tools and techniques to re-purpose those ideas into something new.  However, the "new idea" that takes the market by storm is only new and relevant at that moment in time for that market in those conditions.  Just like pop stars, if they are to survive they must continually anticipate and adapt to the market.

How to adapt? A simple method: evolution.  Differentiate, select, amplify.

Differentiate.  Do something different.  A new product, a new service, a new model, a new flavour.  Test the variants.   Lots of variants.  Constant iteration.

Select. Figure out which one of the variants hits the sweet spot and gets good results.

Amplify.  Do more of this.  Push resources into building / marketing / selling the new variant.

The point is though is that the new variant will never be the best it can possibly be.  It can always be even better by evolving some more.  Keep changing.  Because with evolution, we never design the "best" up front - we continuously discover "better" by trial and error.

The environment in which we operate changes on a daily basis.  What was the best effort 3 months ago is probably less likely to be as good as it could be now.  As someone once said to me "doing more of what you did to get you here isn't enough to get you over there".  So we need to constantly change and adapt.

In this changing world habit is our worst enemy.  Habit holds back evolution because we stop creating new variants.  Of course, there's a reason for habit.  It helps efficiency and for repeatable tasks, processes get tighter and more effective.  That is - if the environment in which they operate remain constant.

The world is innovating faster and faster.  As the world accelerates with new technology, innovation and social trends, we will need to be even more nimble if we are to adapt and succeed.  Failing to adapt means our ideas, our business models or solutions will become dinosaurs - extinct.

I believe this thinking can be applied on so many levels.  To corporate life, to product management, to government, to family life, to careers, to sport.

To live in the present, to evolve and adapt - it requires having some process (habit), but only just enough.

Burning Down The House

"I was in the house when the house burned down".

So sang Warren Zevon on his Album "Life'll kill Ya" in 2000.

Now I've never lived through a world war, but I've had my share of family losses and lived at more than 20 addresses. At work I've lived through two recessions, the dot com bubble burst, and 9/11 (when working in travel).  I've been in 5 companies that have been acquired and three that have had to lay off staff.  I've been through several VC funding rounds.  As an Ops Manager in travel and eCommerce I've had to fire staff, lay off staff and deal with; the death of my customers, vehicle crashes, flight delays, server outages, terrorism threats and avalanches.

So, when I heard Zevon's lyrics, it kind of made me feel - well - old.

Also - I realised that all that experience at the sharp end does make for better intuition and decision making.  Looking back at the younger me coming out of university in the early nineties - I hardly recognise him  - but it's still the same old me.

The thing is - when you're young, you have no way of knowing that something won't work, so you go for it anyway.  Business rewards risk that succeeds - and some of our best entrepreneurs and innovators are young, ballsy and blissfully ignorant of burning houses.  Passionate, energetic - and full of belief.

Increasingly I'm seeing that pairing up experienced hands with youthful vision and energy surely must be the best ingredients for start-up success.  I guess that's why Silicon Valley is a magnet for start ups; experienced VCs mentoring and funding youthful creativity.

If I ever go into business on my own, I'll be Butch Cassidy to a mother-f crazy Sundance Kid.

Embracing Order And Chaos

Ever heard the phrase "living on the edge".

What does it say to you?
- stress, out of control, barely surviving?
OR
- dynamic, exciting, feeling alive?

I often say to colleagues and friends that it's good to live on the edge of chaos.

Coming from someone that is naturally organised and likes to get things done well, this may seem like a contradiction.  Maybe it is.  Increasingly I find though that you can always have too much or indeed too little of almost anything.  For example; fun, pain, sleep, wakefulness, work, play, beer, food, heat, cold.  Add to that list order and chaos.

Order is great when it's obvious when what needs to happen.  Controlled processes are perfect for things like tax returns, train timetables, airline safety and manufacturing efficiency.

Chaos however is very useful when is not obvious about what needs to happen next.

Innovation and the entrepreneurial spirit that pushes our society and economy forward requires a certain randomness to succeed.  Through conflict of opinion, through chance encounters in the corridor, through exposure to different cultures, industries and methods, through trial and error it's through these unordered experiences that we build insight that helps us progress.

Then, ideas are worth nothing without execution, so you need to get ordered to see any results.

In my experience, it generally pays to have process, but only just enough process.

An unstructured mind needs to embrace order to see value come from their ideas.  A structured mind needs to embrace chaos to create the conditions for success.

Managers in an organisation can help construct a culture that leans towards order or chaos.  At any time in the history of a movement, the balance will need to lean towards one or the other.