Showing posts with label teams. Show all posts
Showing posts with label teams. Show all posts

Thursday, 16 January 2014

Why Geese Fly in V Formation

A few years ago I used to row.  It's an amazing sport which requires intense dedication.  But when it comes together the feeling is amazing.  8 guys and the cox in a boat, moving in perfect harmony in 3D, powering the boat with finesse so it planes over the surface of the water.  It's possibly the ultimate team sport.  If one person doesn't show up, you can't take the boat out.  If one person doesn't train as hard, they are carried by everyone else.

Great teams achieve more together than they could alone. 

I was reminded of this today by an BBC news article, Birds' V formation mystery 'solved'. "Scientists say they have solved the mystery of why birds fly in a V formation, by tracking critically endangered birds that were being trained to migrate".

This wasn't news to me.  Our rowing coach had told us about the V-formation of flying geese as a way to explain to us what real team work was.  The birds (as you can read in the article) take it in turns to fly on the front.  This is because the other birds can benefit by flying in the slipstream of the front bird.  One bird works hard so the others can save energy.  Then they switch.  By doing this, they all use less energy that flying straight into the wind all the time.

It's the same for cyclists.  If you watch the Tour De France or any other pro race, you'll see that the "protected riders" are the team leaders.  They save their powder for the big finish of the day and their teams do the hard work to get them close to the finish with a much energy left as possible.  The team leader finishes the job.  In cycling, even on Sunday club ride, each rider is expected to "take their turn" on the front, dig hard and deep for a few minutes before returning to the slipstream of the bunch.  By doing this the speed of the group increases overall.

Needless to say there's lots of lessons to be learned here for how we can be a great team together at work.  It's fairly obvious, but here are some takeaways...
  • take turns on the front
  • share the effort
  • dig deep when it's your turn
  • stay together
  • head in the same direction

I leave you with this video for inspiration...



Tuesday, 17 December 2013

Whose Job Is It Anyway?

One of my favourite maxims is "vision without execution is hallucination".  Not sure who coined the phrase but I like it.  It's all very well saying "let's do something" and it's something else to actually get it done, especially if it involves people.

It's helpful to have some "getting stuff done" tools in your toolkit and one tool that I've found helpful in the past is "RACI".

To get from an idea to reality, we need to know who is going to do the work.  This is where RACI comes in.

RACI stands for "Responsible, Accountable, Consulted and Informed".  It's a usually framework to understand the roles of all the actors in a system required to get a task done.

Responsible
The responsible person is the doer.  (Or doers, i.e. those that actually do the work and deliver to the agreed standards, time frames or expectations).

Accountable
The buck stops here.  This person is answerable for the correct and thorough completion of the task.  It can only be be one person.  The accountable person may well delegate their tasks to a responsible person but they cannot delegate their accountability.

Consulted
Their opinion is sought, these are experts whose skills or knowledge can influence the success of the task.  It's a two way communication flow between the Responsible and Consulted parties. It can be more than one person.

Informed
(Or - told). Those who need to know what's going on.  Not necessarily during task, more likely on completion.  It's a one way communication and it's usually many people.

In any project, you write down all of the tasks down as the rows in your matrix.  In the columns, write either names or job titles.  In the grid, type R, A, C or I in each cell. 



If you do this with all of the people involved you can then get consensus on who does what.

It provides a good grounding for the next part of organising - what interactions (e.g. meetings) and documents are required during the project to make sure everyone gets what they need from the others involved.

Sunday, 24 November 2013

How Do You Do?

From time to time, all of us face at work THE REVIEW. 

In this article I'll share a tip on how to navigate the review process with confidence. My tip is based around one word, "How". 

The review process, normally designed by an enthusiast in HR is imposed on you as a member of the organisation. 

If done well, a review meeting can be a very helpful discussion between team member and manager. It does however require preparation on both sides to be worth doing at all. 

A review is a reflective process followed by a trusting exchange of opinion and fact. At least that's what it should be. So often however it's a one way affair where either the manager or team member have not taken time to reflect, gather information and organise their thoughts. When neither have done so it becomes a farce and worse than useless. 

The sense of trepidation many people feel going into a review either as a manager or as a person being reviewed is sometimes caused by anxiety about the outcome. I'd suggest that it's also caused by a lack of preparation. 

Remember the 7 Ps?

If not, here's a reminder; the 7 Ps is a British Army adage for "Proper Planning and Preparation Prevents Piss Poor Performance".

To prepare properly for a review you need 3 things;

1. Something to review against
2. Facts
3. Understanding

Something to review against would normally be previously agreed goals, targets or objectives. If you don't have these for any reason, a job description is a good back up. 

Facts are useful. Sounds obvious, but you'll need solid examples, numbers, customer feedback, sales figures, project delivery dates etc. 

The understanding piece comes back to the word "how".  "How" is the word that can help you prepare better for a review. 

"How did I/you achieve X?"

By asking this one question you can identify the positive behaviours that need to be encouraged or highlighted. 

It can be used to describe context in a way that facts alone cannot. 

It's a useful little word, whichever side of the table you are on. 

Friday, 1 March 2013

"If You're Going Through Hell, Don't Stop"


You start your holiday with excitement and energy.  Woo-hoo!  No more work for two weeks, we're off!

How long does that feeling last?  When do the arguments start?  Unless you're off back-packing by yourself, you'll be either with friends or family or both.

Here's typically what happens;

Day 1 - excitement, chatter, interest in other people, sharing plans, news and celebrating
Day 2 - more of the same, just a little slower but you're still all on best behaviour
Day 3 - starting to get tired, needing a little more space and time, starting to make less effort towards each other
Day 4 - the arguments start.  You can no longer maintain the being on best behaviour at all times.  You start to say what you really think.  Others do the same.  A few disagreements maybe.  Maybe a full blown out row or face off
Day 5 - you start to adjust to your real travelling companions, their needs and wants, your own needs and wants, your new environment and living space, maybe a few apologies, a few honest and frank conversations
Day 6 - now you're all just being yourself and relating to others in a truthful way, you start to find ways to enjoy yourselves together on this new level
Day 7 - you're more relaxed, start to enjoy the holiday for what it really is
Day 8 onwards - you're having a great time

Does that ring a bell?  Have you ever been in a holiday situation like that?

The pattern repeats itself whenever a new member joins the group or there is some kind of instability such as a change in environment.  You all go back a few steps until you readjust.

The pattern has a name, you might have heard it before... Form, Storm, Norm, Perform

Form - the honeymoon period, everyone is on their best behaviour
Storm - the truth comes out, friction and strife
Norm - adjusting to the reality of the group
Perform - getting the best out of the group in a truthful way

This pattern doesn't just apply to holidays.  It applies to any new collaboration of two or more people.

It applies to relationships.  Remember those first 6 months?  That's the form period.  Some people come off that 6 month period wondering what happened.  You're suddenly arguing about things you never used to argue about.  Here's the truth - it's completely normal to have these arguments (storm).  You need to get through them and accept the other person for who they truly are (norm) before you can be strong as a couple (perform)

It applies to companies.  New people join a company and go through their own form storm norm perform before they truly settle.  Some people just get out at the storm stage but others will persist and that's the route to performance.

It applies to projects.  There's always a doom and gloom middle part of the project where the project manager feels like it's never going to happen.  But it does.

It applies to sport. Setting out (form) on the path to glory (perform) requires a lot of soul searching and pain as you put the training in (storm and norm) to become the athlete you want to become.

In applies to studying.  Learning a new skill is exciting at first (form), but you realise that it's very difficult to commit and put the hours in (storm) and until you manage to do that consistently (norm) you won't succeed (perform).

I've observed this pattern many many times in life and it's helped me enormously.  When the euphoria of a new start wears off I think "hey - this is perfectly normal and to be expected - let's keep going" and it gives me strength.  My expectations are more realistic and I'm less prone to reacting badly to when things go wrong.  I had to learn this the hard way.  Simon, my manager when I was at Eurocamp said observantly, "David, you don't like it when things go wrong, do you?"  He was right of course.  That's still the case, I like to get things right first time.  Now I realise that is an ideal and the real world will hit me hard and I need to push through to see the success on the other side.

As Winston Churchill famously said, "If you're going through hell, don't stop"

Further reading....
Wikipedia Tuckman's stages of group development

Thursday, 3 January 2013

What Google Says Makes A Good Manager

The latest issue of Wired UK magazine has a great section on initiatives companies are taking to improve their workplace and culture.



Of note, there's a section on Google's approach to measuring the quality of it's managers.

In 2009 their HR team analysed who were the best and most successful managers and what particular traits they had.  This research led them to conclude that there are 8 behaviours that make a great manager and they measure their managers against these 8 behaviours.

The project was called "Project Oxygen" and they call these 8 traits the "Oxygen Eight"...

1. Be a good coach

2. Don't micromanage

3. Express interest in employees' well-being

4. Be productive and results orientated

5. Listen to your team

6. Help employees' career development

7. Have a clear vision

8. Have key technical skills

Spending one to one time with people and taking a genuine interest in their lives was the single most appreciated trait of a manager by their team.

Here's a report in more detail from the NY Times (2011)




Wednesday, 17 October 2012

10 Ways For Teams To Do More Useful Stuff


Most managers, most of the time, have a job to do; mostly we manage a team to do stuff.

Sometimes we sit in meetings where ideas flow, sometimes we do deals. However, the nuts and bolts of business is just that; putting together nuts and bolts for other people to buy. (Or in recent years - bytes and bits).

After 20+ years of "getting stuff done" these days as a COO I'm still learning every day about what works. How to organise and coordinate teams in the most effective way. By effective, I mean in the way that creates most value for customers.

If a new manager were to approach me early in their career and ask today, "David, how can I really manage work flow well?", I'd give them the following ten tips. They are what I aspire to myself every day.

Whether it's managing software development teams, call centres, HR projects or staging events, I've found these principles to work. Until recently I hadn't been able to express them clearly. Reading about Japanese production methodologies has helped me reflect on what has worked for me and why.

So, here's my ten tips for getting stuff done well...


1. Make the work flow public

Get the work on the wall. In real time.

These days there are plenty of software solutions to track the status of a project but sadly even the best software fails when it comes to improving team effectiveness. That's because looking at a computer screen is generally not a public process and public processes create peer pressure.

Simply getting the status of the project on a wall and updating it on a daily basis creates awareness amongst all team members and prompts discussions such as, "why is everything stuck in the design phase", "we're not going to hit our target so what are we going to do" or "we're doing well". For example, use post-its that represent tasks that move along between phases of a project, columns for these phases and rows for individuals or sub-teams. Or, in the case of service environments data points such as open cases today, calls waiting, calls successfully answered within 3 rings.

By making the data public and keeping it updated the team starts to work together to address the challenge.

You might think that post-it notes, whiteboards etc are an extra layer of information processing that you don't need if you already track on a computer. Even if there is an extra cost or maintaining real time public work boards I've found the productivity gains to be worth the extra effort. It's counter-intuitive but like most things counter-intuitive it has a surprising effect.

Visual controls. They're very very effective.


2. Go and see the work

You can run all the metrics you like but a good manager needs to be close to the work.

As a Senior Manager this is not practical to do with all the teams that you manage but you still need to periodically "go and see". And literally spend time watching. It's these observations (supported by relevant data) that allow you to make the smart decisions. What's important to fix right now. What's causing the delay / error / problem. Who can help me improve this situation.

A manager is focused on what's closest to him or her. So go to where your customers are and you'll end up focusing on your customers.


3. Be your own customer

I use the word customer in the very broadest sense. Customer can mean consumer, the purchaser of the product or service. Or - a customer could be a supplier. Or - a customer could be a colleague in another team. Basically, if you deliver a service or product to anyone internally or externally, they are your customer.

For example, the finance team are customers of the HR team because they require payroll data from the HR team. The worker getting paid at the end of the month is the customer of the finance team.

Being your own customer can really expose you to the experience of being that customer. What problem is it that you need solved? What does it feel like to have that problem solved by your company? What could be better and why?

At the end of the day, people pay for products and services to solve a problem that they have. E.g. making phone calls (telephone), keeping on touch with friends (social network), self-esteem (fashion), hunger (food), family time (holiday).

If you don't experience the problem and solution yourself you cannot achieve the same level of understanding. Go and be your own customer as a customer would experience it. That helps you to see the value and see the improvements needed.


4. Be able to do the work yourself

Simply sitting with a team creates an awareness that you can't get by sitting in an office next door. Even better, you need to have done the work to truly appreciate what could be improved.

If you can shadow a team member for a day or two, see what it's like to receive the information that they receive, use the tools they use, you are so much more aware of what's important, possible or needed.

Some of the very best managers are those that worked their way up through the organisation from knowing the work in detail from the ground up. They are indeed "grounded" yet have managed to take on senior manager roles. This gives them the ability to have a "helicopter view" and a "ground level view" and they can switch between the two quickly and at will.

This is why it's so important to develop people within a team and train the next generation of leaders from within if at all possible.


5. Reduce work in progress

This is one of the most important and effective principles of all and it's one of the most difficult to achieve. Often we will hear of the importance of focus. Focus is all about deciding what not to do rather than about what to do. It actually about reducing work in progress.

If you have 10 tasks that you are simultaneously working on, you will be switching between tasks a lot. If you have 2 or 3 you can generally work through those in some detail and do them properly. You will actually end up doing more and doing it better. Fact, trust me.

Easy to say, not easy to do. Why?

Think about email as an example. You have a number of projects on the go. You reply to emails, you send emails and that's often because you're collaborating with others to achieve a project goal. Rarely do we work completely alone. The emails that are "sent" go out into the world and one day they might come back with the information you need and you can carry on. In the meantime what do we do? Go to meetings and collect new "to do" actions, plus we reply to whatever is in our inbox. This creates more threads and open items. Everyone else you're working with is doing the same thing and before long the organisation is multi-tasking and task switching adding more and more tasks that get slower and sometimes don't finish at all.

To combat this, discipline is needed. One way to achieve this is to periodically meet as a work group (daily or weekly depending on the group) and identify the top 3 things that matter for the common period and work together on those first every day until they're done. Not 10 things but 3 things.

Work through those 3 things and (here's the important bit), do not start anything new unless you've finished what you can on those 3 things.

You can always create a "queue" to have agreed items next in line once you have spare capacity to "pull" new work onto your schedule.

If you force a limit on the number of items in progress at any one time, the ones in progress move faster and the overall speed of the team improves.

I've found a useful online tool for organising projects and limiting work in progress for this purpose is Kanbanery.


6. Document the process

By writing down your process you have a point from which to measure and optimise it. In fact I would argue that the main purpose of documenting a process is so that you can change it in the future.

The process of documentation (whether it be in words or diagrams) exposes the process to the eyes of the team. You can start to see opportunities to optimise it. Do we really need to do that bit? If we bypassed step 4 would it speed up the process? How many people are involved and could we reduce that? (See point 10).

Go back to the process on a regular basis and ask, "how can we make this process better for our customers?"

Once a team understand that a process is there to be changed and not to be blindly followed without critiquing, it can be very empowering.


7. Measure the flow

How long does it take for a task to go from initiation to completion? Measuring the speed of work but also the variance of work demand is essential to speed up and smooth out the flow. And speeding up and smoothing out the flow (see point 9) leads to better value for all involved.

An example for an HR team; from job requisition approved to offer made, what is our average lead-in time? (And following on from that, what causes the delay in the process and how do we improve that without reducing quality of hires?). If you can measure the flow you can improve it. So go figure out how to measure.


8. Design processes starting with the customer

In any system, there is some kind of end result. Software shipped. Employee hired. Customer enquiry answered. Expenses paid.

When designing processes start with the end customer (either internal or external customer) and figure who sits directly before them in the process. Then who sits before them. And so on. The end customer is "downstream" and the initiator of the process is "upstream".

The process needs to be designed so that the downstream people get what they need when they need it. Then work backwards. This is known as a "pull system". A true pull system provides the quickest path to providing value for the customer.

So many organisations and teams work the other way around. They push things through and you end up with bottlenecks, delays and stress.

This a really tricky principle to pull off well and it requires the buy in of decision makers involved to make it happen. I can't claim to have mastered this myself in all areas of my work. I have however seen it work very well in software development teams that I've managed.


9. Level the flow

What does levelling the flow mean?

In software it means a steady stream of (pulled) productive work without overloading the team with spikes of (pushed) deadlines.

In contact centres it means predicting inbound consumer demand and matching staffing schedules to meet those predicted demands rather than being quite on slow days/hours and overwhelmed on busy days.

Sometimes you'll pull ahead of demand, sometime you'll catch up but all the while your people are steadily adding value in a productive way.


10. Reduce the number of people involved in a task

If a task has 2 people involved and 4 steps it will much faster than if there are 4 people and 4 steps.

If a task has 2 people involved and 4 steps it will be faster than if there are 2 people and 6 steps.

Reducing the steps and the people increases speed and, as long as quality is not decreased, increases value.

Modern companies tend to evolve to create division of labour. This is very useful in fact. A lawyer is better at being a lawyer than a software developer and vice-versa. So for some tasks you need experts. But for others there is division of labour because it's easier to train one person to do one thing than train one person to do many things. Plus, you can pay less for the low value tasks.

So, a simple question to ask is, do I really need this division of labour on this task or do I just need to invest in training?

As customers we hate being passed from one person to another. So as business owners we need to do that only when needed and create multi-talented well trained team.



Recommended reading

The Toyota Way by Jeffery Liker
The Power of Less by Leo Babauta
Kanban by David Anderson
Switch by Chip & Dan Heath


Thursday, 26 May 2011

Feeling Really Damn Good

I was struck this week by a strong reminder of something I've always believed to be true. If I'm honest with myself though, perhaps I haven't always lived by this belief as much as I could. It was a good reminder.

In a restaurant in Lisbon, I was with two colleagues after a long but good day at work. We were all from different countries but the conversation flowed, we laughed, we relaxed and we were having fun. It was midnight and the night was warm.

We shared stories, jokes and opinions. And in doing so we were revealing ourselves. There were no pretensions, no bragging and no taking the mickey. We were just being ourselves and our appreciation of each other deepened.

So what?

Most people, most of the time in my observation are not true to themselves. They follow other people's rules, wear clothes to fit in with what other people think, say things to create an image of themselves that they want to portray to others. It's pretty rare to just be yourself, especially at work.

That looks like fun

As soon as you be yourself, your real self, you have a feeling. I'm not sure I can describe it, but I know it when I feel it.

And when people in groups start being themselves, others do the same. It's contagious and in a good way. Sometimes it can create tension, but at least that tension is transparent, not hidden away. Issues and problems when out in the open are no longer problems, they are opportunities to do something right, to make something happen.

The best performing teams that I've led are the the teams where I've been myself. I'm generally a responsible person but I too have an anarchic side which comes out to play every now and again. In those teams, my maverick nature was not hidden. Equally, my frustration when I wasn't happy with the quality of work performed wasn't hidden either. We did good together, we rocked.

As Primal Scream once noted, "Together we got power, apart we got pow wow".

When each person can be free to be themselves and express themselves through their work they come home at the end of the day knowing they did something meaningful and look forward to waking up and doing more.

High performing teams are honest teams. The first step to an honest team is where people be themselves. Leaders can take the initiative and be themselves first. It takes courage but it feels good. And, paradoxically it's the path to success.

Listening to Eagles Of Death Metal high over the Bay of Biscay, writing down these thoughts I feel good. Really damn good.

Go live. Be yourself, feel good and enjoy the ride.